The Freename Forum

... October 2024, it asked the Chinese domain holder via a broker whether the domain was for sale. The broker did not respond to this request. Playboy therefore initiated UDRP proceedings with The Forum at the end of November 2024. Shortly afterwards, the domain holder contacted us and informed us ...

... this case cripto.com, was blocked. As a result of the blocking, the domain holder can no longer change the content and ownership of the domain and therefore cannot use it to its full extent. Among other things, this prompted Domdevelo OÜ to file a lawsuit with the competent court in Arizona via ...

... agreed to extend this commitment to registries and registrars. From Unstoppable Domains' point of view, the action for a declaratory judgment was therefore invalid. Florcsk, on the other hand, wanted to ensure that Unstoppable Domains did not sue for other domain extensions. In a decision dated ...

... it regularly brings no added value in terms of criminal prosecution in connection with the circumstances in which it is repeatedly called for. “I therefore recommend that the current German government adhere to this ruling and the position set out in the coalition agreement and thus avoid years ...

... However, it is the complainant's responsibility to provide proof of this, which he has not done. Internet users would not be confused here. Brown therefore considered the first element of the UDRP not to be fulfilled, which is why the complainant could not win the proceedings. Nevertheless, Brown ...

... web,” Web3 promises to revolutionize how we interact online by shifting control from centralized entities to individuals and communities. Therefore, businesses need to improve their SEO marketing on web3 to stay ahead of the competition. The Web2 SEO is going through a continuous change ...

... if interests of the name holder worthy of protection were infringed, for example if there was a risk of confusion. This is not the case here. Therefore, the opponent would have legitimate interests in the domain name and there would be no interests of the complainant worthy of protection. ...

... the plaintiff, which is why there was a legitimate interest in evaluating negative experiences with the plaintiff's predecessor. The defendant was therefore not liable as an indirect interferer for the posts on its rating portal. The Fulda Regional Court thus dismissed the action. You can find ...

... names and IP addresses through the PTI, but does not control or manage the entire Internet infrastructure. RIAC also claims that Washington - and therefore the US government - has the ability to influence important political and economic decisions relating to Internet governance. This is certainly ...

... possible licences for secretarial services under the name ‘Moneypenny’ was not sufficient; there was no concrete probability of market entry. It therefore remained to be clarified whether the plaintiff could successfully invoke special legal protection under trademark law - the alternatively ...