The Freename Forum

... As we reflect on the past two years, we couldn’t be prouder of the incredible milestones we’ve achieved. And none of it would have been possible without you — our amazing users: https://freename.io/freename-turns-2/

... known for his very quick decisions and did not disappoint in this case either, was appointed as the decision-maker. Speres dismissed the complaint without further ado because the complainant had not proven the bad faith of the opponent and also found reverse domain name hijacking (RDNH) because ...

... clients or services?” He even questions the definition of the Internet as a common transmission structure and a common protocol address pool, but without giving a conclusive answer. But it doesn't need to be, because one thing is clear: despite the shortage of IPv4 addresses, there are no immediate ...

... or known at the first proceedings, nor was there a breach of the right to be heard. In essence, the appellant had filed the same complaint again without submitting new evidence or reasons that would have led to a different decision in the previous proceedings. It merely referred to new evidence ...

... Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A countered the action and tried to make it clear with its submission that the plaintiff was using the lambo.com domain without authorization. In particular, the defendant emphasized that the domain lambo.com had been offered for sale over the years and that its price ...

... buyer of candy.com was the Web3 company Candy Digital, which expected to do good business during the NFT hype. Now candy.com is for sale again, without a concrete buyer, and Candy Digital has withdrawn to candy.io. If you go to candy.com, you will see a landing page from Hilco Digital that says: ...

The confectionery manufacturer Ferrero S.p.A., owner of the trade mark ‘Nutella’, won the domain notella.site before the WIPO without any problems. The opponent did not know what was happening to him and merely asked whether Ferrero wanted to buy the domain. Ferrero S.p.A., a leading ...

... or their registration was terminated. A distinction was made between developed domains (high-content), parked domains (low-content) and domains without a web presence (no-content). After the respective registration period had expired, the renewal rates of the three categories were examined and ...

... with the case law of the UDRP. However, this did not excuse the initiation of UDRP proceedings. The complainant had started the proceedings without being able to prove or demonstrate in any way that the opponent knew or should have known about them. This was a typical case of Plan B, an ...

... should have realized that an allegation of serious misconduct against a panel is a serious matter and that it should not be made lightly without credible evidence. What the complainant was alleging here was, in fact, merely her displeasure with the previous three-member panel's decision ...